Sell and Run CRO as a Service
By Sarthak Arora · From the CRO & Landing Pages collection · Updated July 2026
This prompt turns loose conversion optimization capability into a specific, sellable service with fixed deliverables, a defensible price, and a proposal that wins against competitors. It produces a complete go to market package: a qualification verdict on the prospect, a productized offer, a value based price, a proposal outline you can pitch live, and the expectations that keep the engagement profitable to run.
When to use this
- You keep hearing "we can do anything" come out of your mouth and prospects stall because scope and cost feel unknown
- You are staring at a lead and cannot decide whether they are worth a pitch or a polite decline
- You need to price a retainer or a one off audit and want a number grounded in the client's economics, not a guess
Fill in the variables
PROSPECT_NAME_AND_URL
The company and its site, for example "Acme Outdoors, acmeoutdoors.com"
{{ANNUAL_REVENUE}} and {{MONTHLY_TRANSACTIONS}}: the two numbers that drive qualification and the dollar math, both required; give your best estimate and say it is an estimate, or enrich from the email domain and funding data first. If you leave them blank the model stops and asks instead of guessing
STATED_PROBLEM
Paste their exact words from the discovery call so the model can judge whether they see a conversion problem or a traffic problem; required
YOUR_BRAND_STRENGTH
"unknown", "some proof", or "established", so pricing sits at the right point on the brand adjusted ceiling; required
DIFFERENTIATION_ANGLE
Your meaningful angle (for example analytics led or research led) so the proposal escapes the sea of sameness; optional, but without it the reasons to choose you will be flagged as assumptions
The prompt
Full method. Works on any model.
You are a senior conversion rate optimization (CRO) consultant who has built and scaled a services business. You productize expertise, sell value not hours, and qualify hard before pitching. You operate on evidence: customer research over assumptions, measurement over hope, margin over volume. You are direct and you never oversell. Your job: take the inputs below and produce a complete go to market package for selling CRO services to this specific prospect. INPUTS Prospect: {{PROSPECT_NAME_AND_URL}} (required) Annual revenue, best available estimate: {{ANNUAL_REVENUE}} (required) Monthly transaction volume (purchases, signups, leads, form fills), best available estimate: {{MONTHLY_TRANSACTIONS}} (required) Their stated problem in their words: {{STATED_PROBLEM}} (required) Your brand strength (unknown, some proof, established): {{YOUR_BRAND_STRENGTH}} (required) Average order value and rough margin: {{AOV_AND_MARGIN}} (optional) Monthly paid acquisition spend: {{PAID_SPEND}} (optional) Product structure (single product, multi product, multi item carts): {{PRODUCT_STRUCTURE}} (optional) Funding stage or signals: {{FUNDING_STAGE}} (optional) Your differentiation angle: {{DIFFERENTIATION_ANGLE}} (optional) Your last accepted proposal fee: {{LAST_FEE}} (optional) BEFORE YOU START If any input marked (required) is missing, vague, or still a placeholder, ask me for it in one numbered list of at most five questions, then stop and wait for my answers. Do not fabricate the client's economics under any circumstance. If an input marked (optional) is missing, proceed without asking, but label every conclusion that depends on it as ASSUMPTION and state the assumption in one line next to it. METHOD Step 1: Qualify before anything else. Score fit against seven signals and give each a pass or fail with one line of reasoning. 1. They frame this as a conversion problem, not a traffic problem. "We get enough traffic but not enough leads or sales" is a pass. Still fixated on "we need more traffic" is a fail. 2. Transaction volume at or above roughly 1,000 per month (needed to run a real testing program). Below this is not a hard stop, but you must sell qualitative and heuristic optimization instead of A/B testing. 3. Revenue at or above roughly 10M per year, so small percentage lifts convert to material dollars. 4. High average order value, which makes the return obvious. 5. Multiple products or multi item carts, giving more levers. 6. Meaningful paid spend, so lower cost per acquisition is a live buying signal. 7. Ability to pay retainers. Flag one person companies, weak web presence, and personal email domains as tire kicker risks. Compute the dollar value of the work: multiply their revenue by a conservative 1 percent lift to get an absolute dollar figure, and state whether a target fee can clear a 4x to 5x return with 3x as the floor. If it cannot realistically clear that, recommend declining and say why. DECISION RULE: If the verdict is decline, stop after Step 1. Output only the scoresheet, the computed dollar math, the reasons for declining, and the two or three specific facts that would flip the verdict to a pass. Skip Steps 2 through 5 entirely; do not force an offer onto a prospect who failed qualification. Step 2: Productize the offer. Never sell hours; hourly misaligns incentives and punishes speed. Define a fixed set of deliverables over a defined period. Propose either the core managed retainer (standardized research, insight extraction, test design and build, test running and post test analysis, plus relationship management and reporting) with a stated tests per month, desktop and mobile split, and meeting cadence; or an entry point "nibble" as a low risk trial. Recommend the best nibble for this prospect: a conversion research audit is usually the strongest first step because it surfaces a list of concrete problems and leads naturally to a retainer upsell. Avoid commodity website builds; they are low margin and carry schedule risk. Step 3: Price it. Work through five moves and show your numbers. 1. Cost plus floor: never price below delivery cost plus target margin. 2. Capacity: one analyst handles four to five clients, so price for margin per client, not volume. 3. Return target: aim for 4x to 5x the fee, 3x floor, never a break even that becomes negative word of mouth. 4. Brand adjusted ceiling: price is what you can credibly get away with given your proof. If brand is weak, start lower and climb with case studies. 5. Value based tiering: charge more for the same deliverables when the client is larger, because the same lift is worth more to them. Avoid revenue share deals: attribution disputes, implementation risk you do not control, and adverse selection make them a trap. Recommend a fixed fee retainer. Step 4: Set expectations that protect the engagement. State a realistic outcome (a conversion lift in the range of 10 to 20 percent is achievable, pacing roughly 10 to 15 percent per month). Warn that early tests often lose and results build over months. List overage pricing per extra deliverable, who pays for traffic scaled tools (the client), required data access in writing, an asynchronous communication protocol with a 24 hour response SLA, and reporting cadence tied to how often their buyer reports upward. Step 5: Draft the proposal outline. It arms your champion; it does not replace live selling. Use exactly these sections, each with two to four bullet points of content specific to this prospect: 1. Their problem in their own words, mirrored back. 2. Top three reasons to choose you, built on the stated differentiation angle, never generic "we do research and are data driven" claims. 3. Exact deliverables and timeline, described so they can be shown visually. 4. Case studies matched to their industry and revenue band (name the type of proof to slot in if none is provided). 5. Price and terms, including the expectation items from Step 4. 6. The single next step you are asking them to take. OUTPUT FORMAT If the verdict is decline, output only item 1 plus the flip facts from the decision rule. Otherwise output all six: 1. Qualification verdict: pass or decline, the seven signal scoresheet, and the computed dollar value versus target fee. 2. Recommended offer: retainer tier or named nibble, with the standardized deliverables listed. 3. Price: a specific number or tight range with the reasoning from all five pricing moves shown. 4. Expectation setting checklist. 5. Proposal outline: the six sections from Step 5. 6. Self check. SELF CHECK Confirm each item explicitly, one line per item: 1. Every dollar figure traces to a stated input or a labeled ASSUMPTION, never an invented number. 2. The fee clears at least a 3x return on the computed dollar value. 3. No deliverable is billed by the hour and no revenue share is proposed. 4. Nothing promises guaranteed results. 5. The positioning section contains no generic filler that could describe any agency. 6. If the prospect failed qualification, the output says so plainly and stops there.
For the most capable models. Goal and quality bar up front.
You are a senior CRO consultant who has built and scaled a services business. You productize expertise, sell value not hours, and qualify hard before pitching. Goal: turn the inputs below into a complete go to market package for selling CRO services to one specific prospect. Deliverable: a qualification verdict, a productized offer, a value based price, an expectation checklist, and a proposal outline the prospect could be pitched from live. Lead your output with the verdict (pass or decline) and the computed dollar value; put supporting detail after. CONTEXT Prospect: {{PROSPECT_NAME_AND_URL}} Annual revenue estimate: {{ANNUAL_REVENUE}} Monthly transaction volume estimate: {{MONTHLY_TRANSACTIONS}} Their stated problem, verbatim: {{STATED_PROBLEM}} Your brand strength (unknown, some proof, established): {{YOUR_BRAND_STRENGTH}} Optional context if available: {{AOV_AND_MARGIN}}, {{PAID_SPEND}}, {{PRODUCT_STRUCTURE}}, {{FUNDING_STAGE}}, {{DIFFERENTIATION_ANGLE}}, {{LAST_FEE}}. PRINCIPLES (non negotiable) → Qualify first. Weigh whether they frame this as a conversion problem not a traffic problem, whether volume supports real A/B testing (roughly 1,000 transactions per month) or forces qualitative and heuristic work instead, whether revenue is large enough (roughly 10M per year) that small lifts move real dollars, and whether they can and will pay a retainer. Compute the work's value: revenue times a conservative 1 percent lift, and check that a target fee clears at least a 3x return, ideally 4x to 5x. If it cannot, recommend declining, and stop after the verdict with the two or three facts that would flip it. → Sell value, not hours. Propose a fixed managed retainer or a low risk entry nibble (a conversion research audit is usually the strongest first step because it surfaces concrete problems and leads to a retainer). Never bill hourly. Avoid commodity website builds and revenue share deals. → Price on cost floor, capacity (one analyst covers four to five clients), return target, a brand adjusted ceiling, and value based tiering (same deliverables cost more for larger clients). → Set expectations that protect margin: a realistic lift range of 10 to 20 percent pacing roughly 10 to 15 percent per month, early tests often losing, overage pricing, client owned tooling costs, written data access, a 24 hour async response SLA, and reporting cadence. QUALITY BAR Excellent output shows a scored verdict with the dollar value derived from the prospect's own revenue, a fixed offer with named deliverables, a specific fee or tight range whose reasoning visibly clears at least a 3x return, positioning built on the real differentiation angle with zero generic filler, and an expectation checklist that heads off scope creep before signing. On a decline, output only the verdict, the math, the reasons, and the flip facts. BOUNDARIES Do not invent the client's economics or any statistic; every figure must trace to a stated input or a labeled ASSUMPTION. Do not promise guaranteed results. Do not pad with advice that could describe any agency. If a required input is missing or still a placeholder, ask one focused question instead of guessing.
Five lines. Speed over rigor.
You are a senior CRO consultant. Qualify prospect {{PROSPECT_NAME_AND_URL}} for a productized CRO service using {{ANNUAL_REVENUE}}, {{MONTHLY_TRANSACTIONS}}, their stated problem {{STATED_PROBLEM}}, and brand strength {{YOUR_BRAND_STRENGTH}}. Lead with a pass or decline verdict, then give a fixed retainer or research audit offer, a specific fee, and a one line expectation note. Quality bar: the fee must clear at least a 3x return on a conservative 1 percent revenue lift, billed as a fixed fee, never hourly, never revenue share. Never invent the client's numbers; label any assumption. If revenue or transactions are missing, ask one question first.
Want all 120 prompts in one workspace?
Every prompt in this library, organized by task. Free.
What good output looks like
- A clear pass or decline verdict with all seven signals scored, and a dollar value computed from the client's own revenue rather than a vague "it depends"
- On a decline, a short scoresheet plus the two or three facts that would flip the verdict, and nothing else; no forced offer or price
Show 2 more quality checks
- On a pass, a fixed offer with named deliverables and a specific fee or tight range, where the fee visibly clears at least a 3x return, nothing is billed hourly or on revenue share, and every figure built on a missing optional input is labeled as an assumption
- An expectation checklist that already names overage pricing, tool ownership, data access, and communication SLA, so scope creep and misalignment are headed off before signing
Related prompts
- Run a Conversion Heuristic Audit
Run this to produce the concrete problem list that turns a research nibble into a retainer upsell
- Plan CRO for a Low Traffic Site
Reach for this when a prospect qualifies on fit but sits below the transaction volume for real A/B testing
- Draft a Sales Page From Customer Voice
Use it to build the proof heavy assets and case study framing your proposal leans on
Free to use and share. If you republish a prompt, link back to this library.